A petitioners’ attestant on Saturday told the Ekiti Governorship Acclamation Address Attorneys that voters were induced with money in Assemblage 008, Ward 4 of Ekiti East Local Government Area, during the July 14 governorship acclamation in Ekiti.
The witness, Ajayi Olanipekun, declared this while testifying afore the attorneys sitting at the FCT High Court, Apo.
The petitioners, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), and its applicant in the Ekiti July 14 governorship election, Prof. Olusola Kolapo had approached the attorneys to claiming the aftereffect of the election.
The respondents in the clothing are the All Progressives Congress (APC), Gov. Kayode Fayemi and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
Answering a catechism during cantankerous assay by Dr Kayode Olatoke (SAN), admonition to Gov. Fayemi, Olanipekun declared that there was money attraction during the election.
He declared that he would be afraid to apprehend that the petitioners did not accuse about that in their address afore the tribunal.
According to the witness, “I will be afraid if the petitioners did not accuse of money attraction in Assemblage 8 (Ward 4, Ekiti East LGA) because there was inducement.”
He added claimed that there was over voting in the unit, adage that, “there was over voting and that is not the alone complaint.”
When beyond advised by admonition to INEC, Chris Onwugbonu, he declared that he voted at the polling assemblage on the acclamation day, abacus that there was no one with him in the polling berth while casting his vote.
According to him, all voters who voted at the polling assemblage that day acclimated the aforementioned action in voting and said that he was present during the allocation and counting of acclamation papers.
He a the attorneys that the alike archetype of the Form EC8A which he tendered and was accepted as exhibit, was accustomed to him at the polling unit, abacus that the aboriginal archetype was with INEC.
Meanwhile, the petitioners alleged six assemblage on Saturday, bringing the absolute cardinal of assemblage alleged so far to 50.
2019: Onuesoke backs Okowa
The assemblage a the attorneys in their accounting statements on oath, which they adopted as their affidavit afore the tribunal, of over voting in their corresponding polling units area they served as PDP agents.
When asked by Olatoke what he meant by over voting, one of the assemblage Adeyanju Adega from Omuo-Ekiti, Ekiti East LGA, declared that it was back the cardinal of vote was added than the cardinal of acclimated ballots.
“Over voting is when, for instance, they acclimated 10 acclamation affidavit and counted 12,” the witness, who was the 49th attestant (PW49) for the petitioners, told the tribunal.
A witness, Kazeem Olusola Ayeye (PW45), from Itapaji, Ado Ekiti LGA, a that he was at his Assemblage 2 polling assemblage of Ward 5 throughout the acclamation and a that PDP polled 40 votes, while APC denticulate 82.
He declared that the absolute cardinal of votes casting was 122 as independent on Display P13 E(5), abacus that this was adverse to the 126 independent in branch 7 of his accounting attestant account on oath.The attorneys chaired by Justice Suleiman Belgore, will abide the audition of the address on Monday, Oct. 29.
Witness Statement Form Is So Famous, But Why? | Witness Statement Form – witness statement form
| Allowed for you to my personal blog site, in this period We’ll teach you regarding witness statement form