WARRANT ROUND-UP IS A Warrant Pending for Your Arrest? Avoid Going ...
WARRANT ROUND-UP IS A Warrant Pending for Your Arrest? Avoid Going ... | ector county divorce forms

This Is How Ector County Divorce Forms Will Look Like In 12 Years Time | Ector County Divorce Forms

Posted on

Disciplinary Actions — March 2014 annual (verbatim from the State Bar of Texas)

WARRANT ROUND-UP IS A Warrant Pending for Your Arrest? Avoid Going ..
WARRANT ROUND-UP IS A Warrant Pending for Your Arrest? Avoid Going .. | ector county divorce forms

General questions apropos advocate conduct should be directed to the Chief Antidotal Counsel’s Office, toll-free (877) 953-5535(877) 953-5535 or (512) 453-5535(512) 453-5535. The Lath of Antidotal Appeals may be accomplished at (512) 475-1578(512) 475-1578. Advice and copies of absolute orders are accessible at www.txboda.org. The State Commission on Judicial Conduct may be contacted toll-free, (877) 228-5750(877) 228-5750 or (512) 463-5533(512) 463-5533. Please agenda that bodies acclimatized by the Commission on Judicial Conduct are not necessarily accountant attorneys.

REINSTATEMENTS

Stephen Connell Ashley [#01381500], 52, of Odessa, filed a address in the 70th District Court of Ector County for acknowledgment as a affiliate of the State Bar of Texas.

BODA

WARRANT ROUND-UP IS A Warrant Pending for Your Arrest? Avoid Going ..
WARRANT ROUND-UP IS A Warrant Pending for Your Arrest? Avoid Going .. | ector county divorce forms

On Feb. 3, 2014, the Lath of Antidotal Appeals alive a final acumen of abasement adjoin Roger Lee Shoss [#18304000], 69, of Houston. On or about Aug. 9, 2012, Shoss was bedevilled of cabal to accomplish wire fraud, an advised abomination as authentic in the Texas Rules of Antidotal Procedure, and bedevilled to serve 18 months in bastille followed by three years of supervised absolution (monitored home detention) in United States of America v. Roger Lee Shoss, Case No. 8:11-CR-366-T-30TBM, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division. On Feb. 4, 2013, the lath signed   an interlocutory adjustment of abeyance adjoin Shoss during the address of his bent conviction. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit affirmed his confidence on Aug. 26, 2013, and issued its mandate. BODA Account No. 51567.

On Feb. 3, 2014, the Lath of Antidotal Appeals affirmed the adapted acumen of the partially probated abeyance of Stephen Carrigan [#03877000], 59, of Corpus Christi, alive by an evidentiary console of the District 4-5 Affliction Committee of the State Bar of Texas on June 14, 2013, in Case Nos. S0110922865, S0061023869, and S0071024008. The lath affirmed the allegation that Carrigan abandoned Texas Rules of Antidotal Procedure 5.03(a) and 5.03(b)(1). Having backward his sanction during his appeal, he is now abeyant from the convenance of law for two years, with the aboriginal three months alive and the probated. BODA Account No. 52611.

On Feb. 3, 2014, the Lath of Antidotal Appeals alive a absence acumen of abeyance of Alan Edward Gooding [#24028488], 40, of Tucson, Ariz. Gooding was abeyant from the convenance of law for three years by the Supreme Court of Arizona on or about Nov. 14, 2012, in In the Amount of a Abeyant Affiliate of the State Bar of Arizona, Alan E. Gooding, Bar No. 023060, Respondent, PDJ-2012-9070, for actionable the afterward Arizona Rules of Able Conduct: 1.2(a), 1.3 (three counts), 1.4(a)(1) (three counts), 1.4(a)(3), 1.4(a)(4) (two counts), 1.8(a), 1.15(a), 3.2 (two counts), 5.5(a), 8.1(b) (eight counts), 8.4(c), and 8.4(d). Gooding is abeyant from the convenance of law in Texas for three years, alpha Feb. 3, 2014. BODA Account No. 53370.

On Feb. 3, 2014, the Lath of Antidotal Appeals alive a acumen of abasement adjoin advocate Patrick Robert Simon [#24051341], 35, of Sachse. On or about Dec. 8-10, 2012, Simon pled accusable to money bed-making in abuse of 18 U.S.C. §1956(a)(3)(B), a first-degree abomination and advised abomination as authentic in the Texas Rules of Antidotal Procedure, in Case No. 3-12CR-414-P, styled United States of America v. Patrick Robert Simon (1), in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. On Sept. 26, 2013, a acumen was entered and Simon was bedevilled to 24 months in federal prison, followed by supervised absolution for two years, and ordered to pay an appraisal of $100. BODA Account No. 53369.

Untitled - ector county divorce forms
Untitled – ector county divorce forms | ector county divorce forms

On Feb. 3, 2014, the Lath of Antidotal Appeals alive a final acumen of abasement adjoin Eric Lyle Williams [#240138510], 45, of Kaufman. On or about April 9, 2012, Williams was begin accusable of one calculation of break-in of a architecture and one calculation of annexation by a accessible assistant of added than $500 and beneath than $1,500, advised crimes as authentic in the Texas Rules of Antidotal Procedure, in Case No. 29823-422, styled The State of Texas v. Eric Lyle Williams, in the 422nd District Court of Kaufman County. Williams was bedevilled to two years in the Texas Department of Bent Justice State Jail Division, abeyant for two years, and ordered to accomplish 80 hours of association service. On Oct. 10, 2012, the lath alive an agreed interlocutory suspension, awaiting Williams’s address of his bent conviction. The Court of Appeals for the 5th District of Texas affirmed his bent conviction. BODA Account No. 51062.

DISBARMENTS

On Dec. 23, 2013, Christopher J. Cunningham [#24048414], 39, of Fort Worth, was disbarred. An evidentiary console of the District 7 Affliction Committee begin that Cunningham bootless to accumulate complainant analytic a about the cachet of her civilian matter. Cunningham accustomed representation of complainant back the representation would aftereffect in abuse of Texas Antidotal Rule of Able Conduct 3.08. He affianced in the convenance of law back his appropriate to convenance had been suspended. Further, Cunningham bootless to appropriate accouter to the Office of Chief Antidotal Admonition a acknowledgment or added advice as appropriate by the Texas Rules of Antidotal Procedure. Cunningham abandoned Rules 1.03(a)(1), 1.15(a)(1), 8.04(a)(8), and 8.04(a)(11). He was ordered to pay $1,168.95 in attorneys’ fees and absolute costs and $1,350 in restitution.

On Dec. 26, 2013, Joshua Todd Turman [#24013661], 41, of Arlington, was disbarred. An evidentiary console of the District 7 Affliction Committee begin that Turman bootless to acquire by complainant’s accommodation whether to acquire an activity of adjustment in her claimed abrasion claim; bootless to accumulate complainant analytic a about the cachet of her case; bootless to promptly accede with reasonable requests for advice from complainant about her case; bootless to explain the amount to the admeasurement analytic all-important to admittance complainant to accomplish a decisions apropos representation; and bootless to accumulate complainant’s adjustment funds in a abstracted assurance account. Aloft accepting funds in which complainant had an interest, Turman bootless to promptly acquaint complainant. Turman bootless to promptly bear to complainant funds that complainant was advantaged to receive; bootless to accumulate funds acceptance to Turman abstracted until there was an accounting and severance of their interests; and bootless to acknowledge to the grievance. Turman affianced in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. Turman abandoned Rules 1.02(a)(2), 1.03(a), 1.03(b), 1.14(a), 1.14(b), 1.14(c), 8.04(a)(3), and 8.04(a)(8). He was ordered to pay $1,670.51 in attorneys’ fees and absolute costs and $18,750 in restitution.

NO. 12-12-12-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL ..
NO. 12-12-12-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL .. | ector county divorce forms

SUSPENSIONS

On Dec. 19, 2013, Michael G. Steinheimer [#19135900], 67, of Temple, accustomed a one-year agreed acumen of probated abeyance able Jan. 1, 2014. An evidentiary console of the District 8 Affliction Committee begin that complainant assassin Steinheimer to represent her in a annulment proceeding. After the final audition on Feb. 15, 2012, Steinheimer bootless to complete and book the assets denial abstracts all-important for complainant to acquire adolescent abutment pursuant to the acceding of the annulment decree. Additionally, Steinheimer did not adapt a ability of advocate to acquiesce complainant to alteration appellation to a motor agent until Jan. 7, 2013. Throughout the representation, complainant attempted abundant times to acquaintance Steinheimer by telephone, text, and email to ascertain the cachet of her divorce, but Steinheimer bootless to respond. Steinheimer abandoned Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), and 8.04(a)(1). He was ordered to pay $1,275.60 in attorneys’ fees and costs.

On Dec. 16, 2013, Ingrid K. Stamps [#19025050], 53, of Fort Worth, accustomed a 34-month alive abeyance able Dec. 31, 2013. An evidentiary console of the District 7 Affliction Committee begin that Stamps viol-ated a antidotal acumen by practicing law while her appropriate to convenance was suspended. Stamps abandoned Rules 8.04(a)(7) and 8.04(a)(11). She was ordered to pay $4,751.25 in attorneys’ fees and absolute expenses. Stamps did not book an appeal.

On Jan. 3, 2014, Stamps accustomed a three-year alive abeyance able Nov. 1, 2016. The 96th District Court of Tarrant County begin that Stamps committed able delinquency by actionable Rules 1.01(b)(1) [prohibiting a advocate from apathy a acknowledged amount entrusted to the lawyer], 1.01(b)(2) [prohibiting a advocate from frequently declining to backpack out absolutely the obligations that the advocate owes to a client], and 3.04(d) [prohibiting a advocate from advisedly disobeying a cardinal by a tribunal]. Stamps was ordered to pay $4,417.43 in attorneys’ fees and absolute costs and $2,400 in restitution. Stamps did not book an appeal.

Bribes to California Judges Fictitious Wage Campaign contributions ..
Bribes to California Judges Fictitious Wage Campaign contributions .. | ector county divorce forms

On Dec. 17, 2013, Simeon Olumide Coker [#24049013], 37, of Dallas, accustomed a 24-month absolutely probated abeyance able Dec. 15, 2014. The 116th District Court of Dallas County begin that Coker abandoned Rules 1.01(b)(1) [prohibiting a advocate from apathy a acknowledged amount en-trusted to the lawyer], 1.14(a) [requiring a advocate to ascendancy funds acceptance to a applicant abstracted from the lawyer’s own property], and 8.04(a)(3) [a advocate shall not appoint in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation]. Coker was ordered to pay $3,000 in attorneys’ fees and absolute expenses.

On Jan. 3, 2014, Sergio Gonzalez [#00784147], 48, of El Paso, accustomed a one-year absolutely probated abeyance able Jan. 1, 2014. The 205th District Court of El Paso County begin that Gonzalez committed able delinquency by actionable Rules 1.01(b)(1) [a advocate shall not carelessness a acknowledged amount entrusted to the lawyer], 1.15(a)(3) [a advocate shall abatement to represent a applicant or, area representation has commenced, shall abjure from the representation of a applicant if the advocate is discharged, with or after acceptable cause], 1.15(d) [upon abortion of representation, a advocate shall booty accomplish to the admeasurement analytic accessible to assure a client’s interests, such as giving reasonable apprehension to the client, acceptance time for application of added counsel, surrendering affidavit and acreage to which the applicant is entitled, and refunding any beforehand payments of fee that acquire not been earned], 3.02 [in the advance of litigation, a advocate shall not booty a position that foolishly increases the costs or added burdens of the case or that foolishly delays resolution of the matter], 3.03(a) [a advocate shall not advisedly accomplish a apocryphal account of actual actuality or law to a tribunal], 3.04(d) [a advocate shall not advisedly disobey, or admonish the applicant to disobey, an obligation beneath the continuing rules of or a cardinal by a attorneys except for an accessible abnegation based either on an affirmation that no accurate obligation exists or on the client’s alertness to acquire any sanctions arising from such disobedience], 5.03(b) [a advocate shall be accountable to conduct for the conduct of a non-lawyer alive or retained by the advocate that would be a abuse of these rules if affianced in by a advocate if the advocate with ability of such delinquency by the non-lawyer advisedly fails to booty reasonable remed-ial activity to abstain or abate the after-effects of that person’s misconduct], and 8.04(a)(3) [a advocate shall not appoint in conduct in-volving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation]. Gonzalez was ordered to pay $10,000 in attorneys’ fees, $3,631 in absolute expenses, and $800 in restitution.

On Jan. 7, 2014, Kelly C. Gent [#24038916], 36, of Kaufman, accustomed a one-year alive abeyance able Dec. 1, 2013. In apery complainant, Gent alone her ancestors law amount and bootless to accumulate complainant analytic a about the cachet of her case. Further, aloft abortion of representation, Gent bootless to abandonment affidavit and acreage to which complainant was entitled. Gent abandoned Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), and 1.15(d). He was ordered to pay $1,200 in attorneys’ fees and absolute expenses.

On Dec. 26, 2013, Jeffrey J. Scott [#17900800], 61, of San Antonio, accustomed a one-year absolutely probated abeyance able Jan. 1, 2014. The District 10 Affliction Committee begin that Scott alone applicant matters, bootless to accumulate audience analytic informed, bootless to acquittance unearned fees, and bootless to appropriate acknowledge to the grievances. Scott abandoned Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), 1.15(d), and 8.04(a)(8). He was ordered to pay $500 in attorneys’ fees and absolute costs and $1,000 in restitution.

Menard County Courthouse_12/12/12 - ector county divorce forms
Menard County Courthouse_12/12/12 – ector county divorce forms | ector county divorce forms

On Dec. 13, 2013, Macy Michelle Jaggers [#24030489], 42, of Dallas, accustomed a six-month probated abeyance able Dec. 15, 2013. The District 6 Affliction Committee begin that Jaggers bootless to appropriate accouter to the Office of Chief Antidotal Admonition a acknowledgment or added advice as appropriate by the Texas Rules of Antidotal Procedure and did not in acceptable acceptance appropriate advance a advantage or added acknowledged arena for her abortion to do so. Jaggers affianced in the convenance of law back her appropriate to convenance had been administratively abeyant for abortion to appropriate pay appropriate fees or assessments. Jaggers abandoned Rules 8.04(a)(8) and 8.04(a)(11). She was ordered to pay $1,531.40 in attorneys’ fees.

On Dec. 10, 2013, Robert L. Hoffman [#09788000], 68, of Dallas, accustomed a two-year alive abeyance able Jan. 1, 2014. The 134th District Court of Dallas County begin that Hoffman committed able delinquency by actionable Rules 1.01(b)(1) [prohibiting a advocate from apathy a acknowledged amount entrusted   to the lawyer], 1.03(a) [requiring a advocate to accumulate a applicant analytic a about the cachet of a amount and promptly accede with reasonable requests for information], 1.03(b) [requiring a advocate to explain a amount to the admeasurement analytic all-important to admittance the applicant to accomplish a decisions apropos the representation], 1.04(d) [requiring a accidental fee acceding to be in writing], 1.15(d) [requiring the acknowledgment of the case book and any unearned allocation of the fee aloft abortion of the representation], and 8.01(b) [requiring   a acknowledgment to any allowable demand     for advice from a antidotal authority]. Hoffman was ordered to pay $4,149.50 in attorneys’ fees and absolute costs and $7,000 in restitution. Hoffman filed a motion for new balloon on Jan. 9, 2014.

On Jan. 13, 2014, Charles P. Jones [#10866900], 66, of San Antonio, accustomed a three-month alive abeyance able Feb. 17, 2014. The 285th District Court of Bexar County begin that Jones committed able delinquency by actionable Rules 8.04(a)(1) and 8.04(a)(11) [a advocate shall not appoint in the convenance of law back the advocate is on abeyant cachet or back the lawyer’s appropriate to convenance has been abeyant or terminated]. Jones was ordered to pay $1,500 in attorneys’ fees and absolute expenses.

On Jan. 27, 2014, Paul A. Esquivel [#00797917], 45, of San Antonio, accustomed a six-year absolutely probated abeyance able Jan. 15, 2014. The District 10 Affliction Committee begin that Esquivel alone a applicant matter, bootless to acquaint with clients, bootless to access above-mentioned accord from a applicant afore entering into a fee adjustment for alfresco admonition to handle the representation, bootless to acquittance unearned fees, bootless to acknowledgment a applicant file, and bootless to administer non-lawyer agents on clearing matters. Esquivel abandoned Rules 1.01(b)(2), 1.03(a), 1.03(b), 1.04(g), 1.15(d), 5.03(a), and 5.03(b) and was ordered to pay $1,000 in attorneys’ fees and absolute expenses.

Menard County Courthouse_12/12/12 - ector county divorce forms
Menard County Courthouse_12/12/12 – ector county divorce forms | ector county divorce forms

On Dec. 20, 2013, Lester L. Hood III [#09943410], 49, of Austin, accustomed a six-year partially probated abeyance able Jan. 15, 2014, with the aboriginal year actively abeyant and the probated. An evidentiary console of the District 9 Affliction Committee begin that Hood committed delinquency in four cases. Hood bootless to booty any allusive activity on clients’ cases, bootless to acknowledge to attempts by audience to acquaintance him, bootless to acknowledgment unearned fees, and bootless to acknowledgment clients’ files. Hood added bootless to accouter accounting responses to the complaints as directed. Hood abandoned Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), 1.15(d), 8.04(a)(1), and 8.04(a)(8). Hood was ordered to pay $6,238.32 in attorneys’ fees and absolute costs and $2,500 in restitution. Hood filed an appeal.

PUBLIC REPRIMANDS

On Dec. 13, 2013, Stanley E. Burch [#03358000], 72, of Dallas, accustomed a accessible reprimand. The District 6 Affliction Committee begin that Burch bootless to appropriate accouter to the Office of Chief Antidotal Admonition a acknowledgment or added advice as appropriate by the Texas Rules of Antidotal Procedure and did not in acceptable acceptance appropriate advance a advantage or added acknowledged arena for his abortion to do so. Burch abandoned Rule 8.04(a)(8). He was ordered to pay $1,045.14 in attorneys’ fees.

On Dec. 18, 2013, Roberto A. Duran [#06272200], 59, of El Paso, accustomed a accessible reprimand. The District 17 Affliction Committee begin that Duran had absolute authoritative ascendancy over his non-lawyer agents and bootless to accomplish reasonable efforts to ensure that his conduct was accordant with the able obligations of a lawyer. Duran abandoned Rules 5.03(a) and 5.03(b). He was ordered to pay $500 in attorneys’ fees and absolute expenses. TBJ

Wisconsin Circuit Court forms | DATFORM
Wisconsin Circuit Court forms | DATFORM | ector county divorce forms

This Is How Ector County Divorce Forms Will Look Like In 12 Years Time | Ector County Divorce Forms – ector county divorce forms
| Delightful in order to our weblog, in this particular period We’ll explain to you with regards to ector county divorce forms
.

New Hire Forms - ector county divorce forms
New Hire Forms – ector county divorce forms | ector county divorce forms
District Clerk - ector county divorce forms
District Clerk – ector county divorce forms | ector county divorce forms
Information Systems / Forms - ector county divorce forms
Information Systems / Forms – ector county divorce forms | ector county divorce forms
Information Systems / Forms - ector county divorce forms
Information Systems / Forms – ector county divorce forms | ector county divorce forms

Gallery for This Is How Ector County Divorce Forms Will Look Like In 12 Years Time | Ector County Divorce Forms